Chat with two AI systems about ADIZ spikes: Global LLM (GPT-4o-mini with external knowledge) and Local RAG (conversational AI trained only on your dataset)
Two Complementary Approaches: 🌐 Global LLM (GPT-4o-mini): Full geopolitical knowledge + your data. Best for "why did this happen?" with external context.
🔍 Local RAG: Conversational AI that uses ONLY your dataset. Semantic search + natural language answers. Best for dataset exploration and fact-checking.
Model: GPT-4o-mini Knowledge: Taiwan-China relations, US policy, regional geopolitics + your ADIZ data Best for: "Why did X happen?", external context, predictions
👋 Hi! I'm GPT-4o-mini with access to your ADIZ dataset AND broader geopolitical knowledge.
Ask me anything like:
• "Why were there 38 incursions on October 15, 2024?"
• "How does this compare to past Taiwan elections?"
• "What might China do if Taiwan gets more F-16s?"
I combine your data with world events and context.
💡 Example Questions:
Why were there 38 incursions on October 15, 2024?
How does China's behavior in 2024 compare to 2022?
What would likely happen if the US sold F-35s to Taiwan?
🔍
Local RAG
Conversational AI - dataset only
Loading...
Status: Loading models...
Knowledge: ONLY your ADIZ dataset (no external info) Best for: Exploring data, fact-checking, finding patterns
⏳ Loading RAG system... This takes ~1 min first time.
Once ready, I'm a conversational AI trained ONLY on your ADIZ data. I can:
• Answer open-ended questions about patterns
• Have back-and-forth conversations
• Explore your dataset with you
• But I know NOTHING outside your data!
💡 Example Questions:
What patterns do you see in arms sales triggering spikes?